
Ask Larry Archives Page 7
Question from Robert McElhone
I didnt get to see many Wrestling at the Chase shows, because I
live in KC, but have always heard great things about them. Do you know when
you will have induction ceremonies for the Hall of Fame and where it would be
held? I would be very interested in coming to the ceremonies. I am a very big
wrestling fan from way back. Also, would there be chances to get autographs of
the great stars who will be inducted? Please let me know, I am very excited
about this happening. Thank you very much
Larry's Response:
Thanks for your interest in St. Louis wrestling, Robert, and especially for
the St. Louis Wrestling Hall of Fame. It is likely that the "open
house" for the Hall will be in mid to late February and it will be
announced on the website.
The Hall will be located at the Pro Wrestling Shirt Shop at South
County Mall in St. Louis.
Now - everyone - please understand this is a cozy corner of the shop's
entire store; it's a good sized display but not a building. There will
be a nice display, plus plaques of those inducted along with items of interest
to St. Louis fans. With a little luck, some memorabilia will also be on
display. For instance, I loaned the ring bell used at Kiel Auditorium
matches to the store. So you can ring the actual bell we used for Kiel
bouts if you wish -- until mall security goes crazy I imagine. LOL
Obviously, many of those to be inducted have passed away. We will
honor their memory. Otherwise, since there is no income to the Hall,
there is no way to pay for transportation and lodging to bring any old timers
to the Hall at this point...although all are surely welcome to be there.
Things may evolve over time, but at this point the "open house" will
be hosted by me, Mickey Garagiola, those who have helped build the idea (Keith
Schildroth, Herb Simmons, Mitch Hartsey, and Nick Ridenour) and perhaps some
local wrestling people (i.e. former referee Lee Warren or Bill Longson's
grandson Bill Colt). Rest assured, everyone wil be happy to sign
autographs.
It will be a fun time and an interesting place to remember those who helped
make St. Louis wrestling special.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Question from Jeff
I was just curious, did Betty Niccoli ever wrestle
Jean Antone on Wrestling at the Chase? I have met Betty in Kansas City
where she lives now, and I forgot to ask her, she and Jean had some rough
bouts. I know Betty sometimes got mad at Jean and worked
"stiff", and are there any tapes of them from the shows? I
know the tapes were destroyed or copied over, just thought there may be one
laying around. I saw a lot of Betty's matches at the Kiel when i was
growing up!!
Larry's Response:
Thanks for bringing up a lady that a lot of St. Louis fans will remember,
Jeff. Betty Niccoli was a terrific performer and a nice person.
She married another wrestler - Akio Sato - and as best I know they are still
together. You probably know the answer to that, Jeff, if you're from the
KC area. Let us know if you will!
Betty probably had more matches with Jean Antone than Thesz had with
O'Connor. Well, maybe not, but it was a lot. Both were from the
Midwest and often booked together. And, I agree, they had some rough and
tumble bouts so Betty's stories would be interesting indeed.
Unfortunately, I don't have any tapes of Betty from "Wrestling at the
Chase." Nor have I seen any, and that's a shame.
Betty's last St. Louis outings were in 1976. I don't think she was as
active after that, plus
most booking of girls wrestling came through The Fabulous Moolah by that
time. Folks should remember Betty, though, because she was an excellent
performer.
On my records I show her beating Jean Antone on tv on Dec. 12, 1970
and lost to Antone on Feb. 7, 1976.
Betty's last TV bout was Feb. 29, 1976 when she and Sally Rivera won from
Antone and Brenda Hoffman
as Betty won the only fall from Hoffman. And I know Betty also was on
TV back into the late 1960s.
Naturally, Betty was at Kiel Auditorium quite a bit and worked with the
likes of Kay Noble, Cora Combs, Marie LaVerne, Marva Scott and naturally
Antone. Betty's last St. Louis outing was April 9, 1976, when she
beat Joyce Grable - another excellent worker.
Betty added a lot of excitement and quality to wrestling in St. Louis.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from Michael St John
Have you ever considered
rebroacasting any of the old Wrestling at the Chase show's on a weekly or
monthly basis? I bet there would be a great interest in this, maybe along the
same lines getting former wrestlers to talk about what is was like to wrestle in
St. Louis and there memories of the the good old days. With the product that is
out there now, it sure would be a welcome change. One other question when is the
Brody book set to be released?
Larry's Response:
I'd love to do that as well, Mike, but the sad reality is most television
stations/channels simply aren't into that. They have a bad taste for
wrestling, even though the ratings are always good. The fact is getting
advertising is difficult, even for WWE except for certain companies and even
they don't pay the rate that ratings would indicate should be paid. And
newer programming people simply think all wrestling is like what is on today,
failing to recognize there are different versions available. Such as St.
Louis and "Wrestling at the Chase."
And even though WWE is starting its own 24/7 channel, all of their product
is slanted heavily to old WWF and WWWF product. Other areas who have
sold tapes to them find the facts twisted and their product buried or
even edited. But you never know what could happen if the right person
was in the right position at a tv station.
As to the Brody book, it should be out late April-early May. I am
doing editing now, along with Frank Goodish's widow Barbara. Also, the
pictures are being added now. Thus, we are on the home stretch!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from Ted Czech
I don't
necessarily have to have my question posted on your site -- I'll leave that up
to you -- but if you do have a few minutes, if you could shoot me an e-mail
back on this, I'd appreciate it. My question (s): In your 12/20/05
column, you mention that Lou Thesz defended the NWA title against Karl
Gotch on 12/27/63. Is this when they first met? If not, then when and how? How
did they get along? I would think they got along pretty well since they both
were considered "shooters" and had a common enemy in Buddy Rogers
and anyone like him who they would consider a "poser." Also, was it
Karl who influenced Lou to wrestle in Japan? I know Karl trained many of
the Japanese wrestlers in the shoot style, that Lou and Karl teamed up in a
tag match in 1973, and I have also read that Nobuhiko Takada was a student of
Lou's, so I was trying to pinpoint about when that happened and under what
circumstances.
Larry's Response:
Ted, Lou Thesz and Karl Gotch were definitely two of the most
legitimately tough and skilled ever inside the squared circle. That St.
Louis bout I mentioned was the omnly time they clashed here, though I would not
be surprised if they met a time or two elsewhere. I'd feel comfortable
that they had mutual respect. That night in 1963 I met Lou's father,
Martin Thesz, for the first time and spent some time wirh him. Remember, I
was only 16 then...but I definitely remember Mr. Thesz saying, "Tonight,
kid, you're going to see a REAL wrestling match between Lou and that boy Gotch."
I'll assume that Lou echoed his father's feelings. As to Japan, Thesz was
there long before. He was headlining bouts in Japan and the Orient in the
mid-1950s, which would be before Gotch went. Just a thought...if you
haven't read Hooker by Lou Thesz and Kit Bauman -- find a copy. It's a
terrific book with a different viewpoint on many things. I might add...I
have only two autographed pieces of memorabilia, having learned not to herro-worship
at an early age. One is an autographed picture to me from Sam....and one
is that book from Lou to me. Thesz was one of a kind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from
Dan:
I was wondering who you would rate as the top 10 wrestlers in the 1970s on
wrestling at the chase in order. And secondly i wanted your opinion on
who would have won these matches.
Bruno Sammartino vs Jack Brisco, Johnny Valentine vs Rufus R Jones, Dory Funk
Jr. vs
Vern Gagne, Harley Race vs. Billy Robinson, Big Bill Miller vs Ron
Fuller, Terry Funk vs Dory Funk Jr and David Von Erich vs Kerry Von Erich.
Larry's response:
It's a tough questrion, Dan, to put an order on all the stars who graced
"Wrestling at the Chase" in the 1970s. And I'm going to do the
politically correct thing -- duck the answer!
That's tongue-in-cheek, of course, but I honestly wouldn't feel right
naming one over another for the entire decade. We were blessed with so
much talent in that time span that I doubt there were more than a few
meaningful stars who didn't appear. Since my background was in promotion
and booking, I was actually trained by Sam Muchnick to balance all sorts of
factors about each grappler.
For instance, certainly someone like Harley Race was a dominant figure in
main events from the mid-70s into the 80s. He held the NWA world title
for a great portion of that time. Yet Dory Funk, Jr. had a similar run
that actually began in 1969. Put them one against the other. I
don't know that I could name one as beter than the other. At different
times throughout the period, one probably was better but based on what
standard? Drawing power? Actually wrestling ability, and by that I
mean in pure wrestling? Wrestling with rough and tumble thrown in?
I'll blame Sam for this, since we usually had this picture in our minds of
anywhere from six to ten guys who could headline at any given time and provide
a) drawing power and b) a great match. The truth is my opinion is no
more accurate or valuabvle than that of you or any other serious fan.
But to put that big group together, I'd say name thoise who held the World
Championship in the 70sa along with those who held the Missouri Championship
and that's where you'd begin to figure out an order. But don't forget
smeone like, say, David Von Erich who started his ruyn in ther late 70s.
See what I mean, Dan? It ain't easy!!!
As o winners of the bouts you name, let me offer the folowing opinions..
Sammartino versus Brisco....classic powerhouse versus pure wrestler.
I like pure wrestlers, but lots of folk who saw Bruno in his prime would say
baloney.
Valentine versus Jones....Valentine has long been one of tghe most
underrrated, forgotten true tough guys in the history of wrestling.
Dory Jr. vs. Gagne....a lot would depend upon which time period each was
coming from, but Gagne was a oure wrestler in the great mold of Brisco.
Race vs. Robinson....very interesting, both had reps as real tough guys.
Robinson had more scientific training.
Miller vs. Fuller....Fuller was fine athlete, but Miller (like Valentine)
was not appreciated for his athleticism and toughness. He played in the
Rose Bowl for Ohio State where he also excelled as a grappler.
Funk vs. Funk and Von Erich vs. Von Erich. We all know that Sam
Muchnick would have NEVER put brother against brother no matter what it would
draw!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from BK
I was wanting some information on Wrestling at the Chase. I was mainly
wanting to know when the show stopped being televised from The Chase Hotel and
also what venues it used after that.
Also,
How was the show formatted? Was it mostly squash matches and interviews,
or did it have competitive main events?
Larry's response:
BK, "Wrestling at the Chase" officially moved to the KPLR studios
in the Chase Hotel complex in the early 70s. It had become impossible to
get the necessary dates at the Khorassan Room in the Chase. That
facility was booked solid Saturday and Sunday. Thus, wrtestling could
not get in until Monday eveniung. But it was impossible to hold top
talent over from Friday night at Kiel/Arena until Monday. Plus, Monday
night was also a date top guys could earn good money in bigger facilities.
As you probably noted in the book Wrestling at the Chase, pay for television
was minimal and barely enough to cover hotel and living expenses if that.
Format wise, that era even in St. Louis generally had better wrestlers
against lesser wrestlers. But there were many "even" bouts and
even in what would be considered lopsided matches, Sam Muchnick insisted
the underdogs put up a fight. Many promotions in other cities
expected the underdog to get his tale whipped in two minutes and do nothing.
Didn't work that way, generally, here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from John Davidson
Larry, I was at the all in team match pitting Andre and Rocky Johnson
agains Ric Flair and Dick Murdock who was a sub for King Kong Brody. I remember
Flair pinned Johnson with a flying elbow drop and got the title shot against
Race the following card. I also remember Brody was snowed and and Murdock had to
sub. Did this mess up the intended bookings? Was Flair originally supposed to be
the one who made the pin and got the title shot? Or was Brody supposed to have a
"grudge match" a couple of cards later against Andre instead of
Murdock? Also I remember that both Murdock and Brody appeared to have the upper
hand in their matches with Andre that spring. Both lost by DQ. It seemed that
the goal of their matches with Andre was to increase their drawing power. Did
Sam ever consider having either Murdock and/or Brody put Andre over cleanly
setting up a title shot for Andre? Given the size and reputation of Andre a
clean loss would not have hurt either's drawing power and an Andre vs. Race
title match would have been a sell out for sure. I can see it now: Andre gets
the first fall with a Giant Splash. Race gets the second when Andre is DQ'd for
accidentally tossing Race over the top rope. In the third fall, both men are
counted out after they tumble over the top rope when Race attempts to lift Andre
for a slam. Would have been something.
Larry's response:
That was a terrific night, John, so not surprised you remember it well.
My first thought is many people from the outside might have thought Brody just
blew off the date for some reason. But, no, he really was snowed in when
the Dallas airport shut down.
But, no matter, because Flair was getting the pin and the title shot
against Race on the next show. I'mrying to recall if there would be the
hint of trouble between Brody and Andre, but I don't recall that honestly.
The idea was to get Flair a big win with great names to set up the crack at
Harley. Keep in mind that Rocky Johnson had a strong history with Race,
so Ric's victory was important.
Your points are well thought out as to Brody and Murdoch against Andre
individually. But the idea, as you suspected, was to give Brody and
Murdoch a it of a boost for standing uo to Andre. Part of the problem,
of course, was that Andre was untouchable as far as doing a job so there was
no way to ever even it out. I guess in a perfect world taking the time
to dicker with Vince McMahon, Sr. (who booked Andre) and Andre himself might
have led to a "job" one time if Andre got it back. And, much
as I loved Dickie Murdoch, only Brody would have had a chance to get the
victory because of Brody's status in Japan. In the end, the DQ was the
easy out unfortunately and still let fans have that image one-on-one...The
Giant and Brody, The Giant and Murdoch.
I do know Sam and I talked about his thoughts on Andre against the
champion. Obviously, Andre was not going to be the champion because Sr.
was not giving up booking rights to him. Plus, as Sam said, booking
Andre as cham,pion would have been a nightmare. And, from
Sam's standpoint, there was no way he could be satisdfied with any finish on
an Andre title match because it would have so patently easy to expect.
One thing on Brody-Murdoch, another with the champion. He simply wasn't
comfortable at all with the idea.
Paul Boesch did do it in Houston..I think maybe twice. And it
probably happened a few other times. Of course, it was going to draw a
house. But I think the flawed finish, in Sam's mind, would just
reinforce some people's ideas about wrestling and that was something he wanted
to avoid in St. Louis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question from Brandon Smith
There's this constant question I still can't figure out about
Ted DiBiase. He had a fabulous run up to 1981 with the Missouri Title. He also
done a fantastic angle in Georgia with the piledriver incident with The
Freebirds. Ted had much more wrestling talent than Tommy Rich and Dusty
Rhodes. My question is was that since Jim Crocket was NWA president from 1980 to
1982, and his "close" neighbors and promoters were from Florida
and Georgia in the Southeast, did that prevent Ted from winning the NWA Title. I
also heard that Ted didn't get along with a booker in Atlanta who was an NWA
board member. Can you help me shed some light into this scenario. Your promotion
made me believe that Ted was the future world champion by giving Harley
Race a big scare and defeating the other big stars. Thank You for your time.
Larry's response:
I honestly believe if the Sam Muchnick had continued to have influence in
the National Wrestling Alliance, and the business would have lasted a few more
years in the structure it had, that Ted DiBiase would likely have had a run as
World Champion. You actually are interpreting the situation pretty
accurately I'd say. Ric Flair was Jim Crockett's choice. The
Georgia office had a certain amount of turmoil, although I was not aware of
any major "heat" on Ted from Atlanta. Not saying it wasn't
possible; I just didn't know of any. Florida was likely a swing vote,
though I don't think Ted was that strong there. By that time, Sam had
phased out of that type of decision. However, I'd say he found Ted to be
the type of solid, reliable citizen (think Dory Funk, Jr.) who would do well
as champion since he was an excellent performer, good talker, respectable in
away-from-wrestling situations, generous (maybe too much) about "selling"
for others, and a good figure to play off of more bizarre characters.
The tools were there, but the timing and the politics were not.